In the future, any motion, brief, memorandum, etc., prepared by See Brief of Arlene Conte and Ralph Conte at 6-7. LWe note, without further comment, the likelihood the font was condensed for these purposes. 1 This conduct must be viewed in theĬontext of the letter addressed to the court by plaintiffs' counsel,ĭemonstrating dissatisfaction with our prior memorandum. Compare Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration (employing an appropriate, Roman-style font) with Plaintiffs' Brief in Support of Motion for Reconsideration (employing the much smaller type). Apparently considering these limitations overly confining, plaintiffs have filed two briefs (brief in support of the motion and reply brief) of 25 pages, using a proportional font plainly intended to squeeze as much typeface as possible onto a page. Among those limitations were a 25-page limitation on briefs and compliance with our Local Rule concerning typeface. In an Order of Court dated October 13, 1999, we placed limitations on the motions for reconsideration. Before the court are motions for reconsideration filed by plaintiffs and defendant MLA Management. On September 30, 1999, the court issued a memorandum and order addressing a number of motions by the parties. The remaining defendants are FirstĮastern Bank, N.A., First Eastern Corp., MLA Management Associates, Inc., Ralph Conte, and Arlene Rainess Conte. Cedrone, C.B.G., Ltd., Oneida Water Co., and Valley Utilities Co., Inc. 23, and default has been entered against defendants Frank M. Plaintiffs were certified to proceed as a class pursuant to Fed. Succinctly stated, plaintiffs allege a long history of mismanagement, broken promises, and fraud on the part of persons in ownership and management positions at Valley of Lakes over the years. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey and was transferred to this court by Order of Court dated March 15, 1995. 45:15-16.47 (Count IV) and the common law of New Jersey for fraud and deceit (Count V).
SAMPLE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION APPELLATE NJ FULL
1983 (Count III) the New Jersey Real Estate Full Disclosure Act, N.J.S.A. 1961-1968 (Count I) the Interstate Lands Sales Full Disclosure Act, 15 U.S.C. On June 17, 1994, plaintiffs, lot owners in a recreational development called the Valley of Lakes, commenced this action with the filing of a complaint pursuant to: the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C.
Motion for alternative relief, namely for permission to file an immediate appeal. Septem(except for the scheduling of expert The following is the Memorandum and Order of February 8,Ģ000 which denied Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration of the Order of | Exhibits | Supplemental Pleading | Court Decisions | Valley of Lakes RICO Case: Complaint | News Articles
0 kommentar(er)
